RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05481
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation date reflected in Block 12b of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from 3 Sep 03 to 30 Sep 03.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The 3 Sep 03 date must be a typo because he separated on 30 Sep 03.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________ ______________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Air Force on 25 Sep 01.
The AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, under Special Order AE-0464, dated 3 Sep 03, on file in the applicants military personnel records reflects his effective date of separation as 3 Sep 03.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was separated from the Air Force on 3 Sep 03 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Jul 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. While the applicant has provided a copy of a Reenlistment Eligibility Data Display (REDD) report which indicates his date of separation was 30 Sep 03 as he contends, we are not convinced that said document is sufficient to convince us that the official documents related to the applicants separation (Discharge Orders and DD Form 214) are in error or unjust. Instead, we find it much more likely that the REDD report, which derived from data from the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS), is erroneous in this regard. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05481 in Executive Session on 10 Sep 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 13 Nov 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 29 Jan 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05841
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05481 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation date reflected in Block 12b of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from 3 Sep 03 to 30 Sep 03. The AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, under Special Order AE-0464, dated 3...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00931 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15 she received on 10 Apr 03 be removed from her records. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05135
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05135 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 23 Jan 02 to 2 Jul 01 or in the alternative his TAFMSD be changed back to the original TAFMSD of 30 Sep 01. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02727
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02727 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of JGA, and Narrative Reason for Separation (Entry Level Performance or Conduct) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can apply...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02996
On 30 May 2003, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) with a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct. He served on active duty for 7 months and 16 days. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03547
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03547 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends granting relief to correct the administrative errors on the reissued DD Form 214, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that on 31 Jul 07, he was released from active duty and retired in accordance with the provisions of 10 USC Section 1251, rather than being transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Therefore, the applicant submitted a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02037
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from his military personnel records pertaining to matter at hand, and an excerpt from Air Force Instruction (AFI), 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force. Under the provisions of the AFI, a service member receiving a 1J RE code is eligible to reenlist; however, the AFI also states the service member is allowed to reenlist if he is otherwise eligible, must be present for duty, and will not reenlist...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03468
His first sergeant attempted to assist him with obtaining a hardship discharge; however, he found out that it could take up to two years. On 28 Nov 2007, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force with a RE code of 2C. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...